- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
An Ohio appellate court upheld a decision against a physician who, after successfully arguing that his decision to waive a hearing did not preclude him from appealing the state medical board's decision to deny him a license, had claimed that the board improperly rejected his submission of supplemental evidence.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.