- Federal appeals court rejects hair braiders’ constitutionality challenge
- $368K in board’s licensing fees “stuffed in drawers and filing cabinets” and never deposited, auditor finds
- Deregulation efforts more likely in Republican states with fewer minorities
- Reciprocity does not require similar training programs, court finds
- “Mirroring” of discipline by another state “unduly harsh” and arbitrary
An Ohio appellate court upheld a decision against a physician who, after successfully arguing that his decision to waive a hearing did not preclude him from appealing the state medical board's decision to deny him a license, had claimed that the board improperly rejected his submission of supplemental evidence.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.