- Court reinstates lawyer’s discipline for performing conflicting role in same transaction
- Reliance on hospital peer review report—inadmissible hearsay—dooms disciplinary decision
- Contracting, confidentiality, and anti-competitiveness problems affect accountancy board, sunset panel finds
- Federal court: Use of “engineer” label does not imply licensure status
- Board directors face salary cuts after Nevada AG says they can’t be paid more than governor
An Ohio appellate court upheld a decision against a physician who, after successfully arguing that his decision to waive a hearing did not preclude him from appealing the state medical board's decision to deny him a license, had claimed that the board improperly rejected his submission of supplemental evidence.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.