- With sweeping new law, Arizona aims to reset national standards for license portability
- Licensee cannot “contract out” of duties required by state licensing law, court rules
- State can deny license for licensee’s failure to report own daughter’s abuse
- Court reverses denial of license for applicant’s lack of remorse for drug crimes
- Panel not required to prove that applicant intentionally lied about felony conviction
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit held February 5 that cosmetology students working at a salon accepting paying customers, but operated by their cosmetology school, are not entitled to be paid for that work if the school is not requiring them to work more than necessary to acquire the hours needed for licensure.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.