- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit held February 5 that cosmetology students working at a salon accepting paying customers, but operated by their cosmetology school, are not entitled to be paid for that work if the school is not requiring them to work more than necessary to acquire the hours needed for licensure.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.