- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
A physician and chief of surgery who discovered his hospital was filing falsified data about surgery mortality and complications, affecting the institution's reimbursement rates, and who blew the whistle on the hospital, will get a chance to pursue his complaint of defamation against it in court, thanks to a January 31 ruling by the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.