- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
The Supreme Court of Oregon, in a June 2 decision, upheld a sanction for unlicensed practice imposed by the state's architectural board on two men who submitted master plans for projects in Oregon despite not having an architect's license in the state.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.