- Court may not order board to delete discipline from databank during appeal
- Waiver of appellate hearing precludes submitting supplemental evidence, court affirms
- Position statement on practice scope did not violate rulemaking process
- Unreliability undercuts character witness testimony for reciprocity
- Board cannot deny license for drug conviction unrelated to practice
The Supreme Court of Oregon, in a June 2 decision, upheld a sanction for unlicensed practice imposed by the state's architectural board on two men who submitted master plans for projects in Oregon despite not having an architect's license in the state.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.