- Federal appeals court rejects hair braiders’ constitutionality challenge
- $368K in board’s licensing fees “stuffed in drawers and filing cabinets” and never deposited, auditor finds
- Deregulation efforts more likely in Republican states with fewer minorities
- Reciprocity does not require similar training programs, court finds
- “Mirroring” of discipline by another state “unduly harsh” and arbitrary
The Supreme Court of Oregon, in a June 2 decision, upheld a sanction for unlicensed practice imposed by the state's architectural board on two men who submitted master plans for projects in Oregon despite not having an architect's license in the state.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.