- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
An accomplished physician who had suffered impairment from multiple brain tumor surgeries was not entitled to an alternative exam in his quest for recertification, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held September 3 (Rawdin v. American Board of Pediatrics).
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.