- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
The Supreme Court of Vermont rejected a challenge by a formerly licensed physician to a board decision denying the reinstatement of her license in July, holding that statutory language limiting the ability of the board to deny entry into the practice of medicine applies only to new applicants, not licensees who have been disciplined (In re Taylor).
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.