- Federal appeals court rejects hair braiders’ constitutionality challenge
- $368K in board’s licensing fees “stuffed in drawers and filing cabinets” and never deposited, auditor finds
- Deregulation efforts more likely in Republican states with fewer minorities
- Reciprocity does not require similar training programs, court finds
- “Mirroring” of discipline by another state “unduly harsh” and arbitrary
The Court of Appeals of Iowa, in a November 26 ruling, affirmed a board's order that a pharmacist undergo a mental and physical evaluation based on multiple "second hand" accounts of public intoxication (Doe v. Iowa Bd. of Pharmacy).
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.