- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
The Supreme Court of Connecticut, in an August 13 decision, affirmed the use of the preponderance of the evidence standard in licensing cases, ruling against a doctor who had argued in his appeal that the board must use a stronger standard when acting to impair a license
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.