- Court reinstates lawyer’s discipline for performing conflicting role in same transaction
- Reliance on hospital peer review report—inadmissible hearsay—dooms disciplinary decision
- Contracting, confidentiality, and anti-competitiveness problems affect accountancy board, sunset panel finds
- Federal court: Use of “engineer” label does not imply licensure status
- Board directors face salary cuts after Nevada AG says they can’t be paid more than governor
The Supreme Court of Connecticut, in an August 13 decision, affirmed the use of the preponderance of the evidence standard in licensing cases, ruling against a doctor who had argued in his appeal that the board must use a stronger standard when acting to impair a license
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.