- Court reinstates lawyer’s discipline for performing conflicting role in same transaction
- Reliance on hospital peer review report—inadmissible hearsay—dooms disciplinary decision
- Contracting, confidentiality, and anti-competitiveness problems affect accountancy board, sunset panel finds
- Federal court: Use of “engineer” label does not imply licensure status
- Board directors face salary cuts after Nevada AG says they can’t be paid more than governor
The Court of Appeals of Oregon, in an April decision, settled uncertain case law regarding the standard of proof necessary to prove fraud or misrepresentation against a licensee, settling on a "preponderance of the evidence" standard, which requires only evidence showing that such conduct is more likely than not.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.