- Court reinstates lawyer’s discipline for performing conflicting role in same transaction
- Reliance on hospital peer review report—inadmissible hearsay—dooms disciplinary decision
- Contracting, confidentiality, and anti-competitiveness problems affect accountancy board, sunset panel finds
- Federal court: Use of “engineer” label does not imply licensure status
- Board directors face salary cuts after Nevada AG says they can’t be paid more than governor
A doctor whose memory impairment made it difficult for him to take multiple-choice exams was not entitled to his requested disability accommodations on a board certification test because he still had average test-taking abilities and because the accommodations would fundamentally alter the nature of the exam, a federal district court in Pennsylvania ruled November 6
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.