- Court reinstates lawyer’s discipline for performing conflicting role in same transaction
- Reliance on hospital peer review report—inadmissible hearsay—dooms disciplinary decision
- Contracting, confidentiality, and anti-competitiveness problems affect accountancy board, sunset panel finds
- Federal court: Use of “engineer” label does not imply licensure status
- Board directors face salary cuts after Nevada AG says they can’t be paid more than governor
A chiropractor who had been hired by an insurance company to provide an independent medical examination for an insurance case owed no duty of care to the patient, said an appeals court in Michigan December 3. The court reversed a disciplinary decision by the state chiropractic board placing the licensee on probation for negligence
Photo by Graham (https://www.flickr.com/photos/44461337@N06/)
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.