- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
The Supreme Court of Kentucky, in an August 16 decision, reversed a state court of appeals that had overturned a board's discipline of a physician on the grounds that the board's hearing officer failed to recommend a specific penalty and that the board had not considered the case's entire record.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.