- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
A physician's good intentions and lack of indifference to a patient's well being did not conflict with the state medical board's conclusion that he was grossly negligent in treating a patient, the Court of Appeals of Utah ruled August 18 (Martinez-Ferrate v. Department of Commerce, Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing).
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.