- Court reinstates lawyer’s discipline for performing conflicting role in same transaction
- Reliance on hospital peer review report—inadmissible hearsay—dooms disciplinary decision
- Contracting, confidentiality, and anti-competitiveness problems affect accountancy board, sunset panel finds
- Federal court: Use of “engineer” label does not imply licensure status
- Board directors face salary cuts after Nevada AG says they can’t be paid more than governor
A physician's good intentions and lack of indifference to a patient's well being did not conflict with the state medical board's conclusion that he was grossly negligent in treating a patient, the Court of Appeals of Utah ruled August 18 (Martinez-Ferrate v. Department of Commerce, Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing).
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.