- Court vacates board’s unexplained denial of reciprocal license for military spouse
- Board appeals malpractice ruling that undermined its 2016 revocation of doctor’s license—and wins
- Revocation and $430,000 in fines and legal costs upheld for “massive” fraud by doctor
- Federal court allows suit over lifetime monitoring of licensee with psychiatric condition to proceed
- Court overturns revocation for 2007 child sexual assault conviction
A physician's good intentions and lack of indifference to a patient's well being did not conflict with the state medical board's conclusion that he was grossly negligent in treating a patient, the Court of Appeals of Utah ruled August 18 (Martinez-Ferrate v. Department of Commerce, Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing).
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.