- Court reinstates lawyer’s discipline for performing conflicting role in same transaction
- Reliance on hospital peer review report—inadmissible hearsay—dooms disciplinary decision
- Contracting, confidentiality, and anti-competitiveness problems affect accountancy board, sunset panel finds
- Federal court: Use of “engineer” label does not imply licensure status
- Board directors face salary cuts after Nevada AG says they can’t be paid more than governor
An Oregon appellate court overturned several counts of board discipline against an Oregon doctor on the grounds that many of the charges initially cited by the board in its notice to the licensee were either too vague or different from the charges actually cited as bases of discipline in the board's final order.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.