- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
An Oregon appellate court overturned several counts of board discipline against an Oregon doctor on the grounds that many of the charges initially cited by the board in its notice to the licensee were either too vague or different from the charges actually cited as bases of discipline in the board's final order.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.