- Federal appeals court rejects hair braiders’ constitutionality challenge
- $368K in board’s licensing fees “stuffed in drawers and filing cabinets” and never deposited, auditor finds
- Deregulation efforts more likely in Republican states with fewer minorities
- Reciprocity does not require similar training programs, court finds
- “Mirroring” of discipline by another state “unduly harsh” and arbitrary
In a December 1 memorandum opinion, the District Court of Virginia ruled in favor of a board's decision to sanction a chiropractor, holding that the board did not violate any antitrust laws (Petri v. Virginia board of Medicine).
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.