- Federal appeals court rejects hair braiders’ constitutionality challenge
- $368K in board’s licensing fees “stuffed in drawers and filing cabinets” and never deposited, auditor finds
- Deregulation efforts more likely in Republican states with fewer minorities
- Reciprocity does not require similar training programs, court finds
- “Mirroring” of discipline by another state “unduly harsh” and arbitrary
The Court of Appeals of Tennessee rejected the argument of a disciplined doctor that the state’s medical board could not bring a discipline case against him because his license had lapsed during legal proceedings (Oni v. Tennessee Department of Health), in an August 23 decision.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.