- Board investigator’s implied threat of sanctions excludes use of his interview of licensee as evidence in criminal case
- Vermont board would take 23% fiscal hit by signing on to interstate compact
- Unprofessionalism, sloppiness, and rudeness of surgeons linked to patients’ post-op complications
- Low public awareness found in online survey about discipline of doctors
- Board’s flawed case was not unreasonable, court finds in denying fees and costs
The Tennessee Supreme Court, in a May 7 decision, held that a state law that allows impoverished defendants to access the court system if they are unable to pay court fees does not apply to attorney reinstatement proceedings, as those proceedings are under the sole purview of the Court under the Tennessee Constitution.
The content you are trying to access is only available to members. Sorry.